KM on a dollar a day

Musing on knowledge management, aid and development with limited resources

Who’s afraid of complexity in aid?

with 14 comments

Complexity is fast becoming a hot topic among development economists and aid bloggers. There have been a number of great presentations and papers on this (Owen Barder and Ben Ramalingam have both written accessibly on this on their blogs and in papers). There has also been some back and forth about what complexity really is, and whether people are really understanding and using it properly, some of which is quite academic, and a little intimidating.

This increased attention is a positive thing since in development many of the real life situations we deal with can indeed be characterized as “complex adaptive systems” and so treating them as if they are engineering problems with a clear linear cause and effect, as has been the tendency in aid planning in the past, will continue to lead to disappointing results.

But I’m also a little concerned that the tone of some of the current discussion can also leave the non-initiated with some unfortunate and mistaken impressions:

1. Complexity is well, complex (or is that complicated?), so to understand it you need to be really, really smart. The rest of us should stay aware for fear of making a faux pas and looking stupid (Maybe the tone and language of some of the academic debate doesn’t help).

2. Given how hard this is to understand, if we are to take it seriously in how we plan and deliver aid, we will need to hire high powered academics and management consultants or create a  specialized cadre of “complexity officers”.

3. Since development is  so complex then we can never be really sure about the results of what we are doing,  why try?. Won’t the system just “evolve” itself into the most suitable outcome over time anyway? and won’t this be much more effective and efficient if we don’ t interfere?

Not quite.

Complexity is indeed a complicated field of study, and like with many other topics in development, one around which there is incomplete knowledge and different schools of thought. So if you want to publish academic papers on it, or debate about it with other intellectuals you need to get yourself up to speed.

BUT even without a deep academic knowledge  it’s quite possible to understand what a complex system is, recognize one when you see one, and to use some simple approaches to deal with it.

Complex systems are not something new, they are as old as humanity and we have all been navigating them mostly successfully before we were even aware that such a topic existed.

One of my favourite analogies for this is that of raising a child. Yes, we can read books and get advice on how to do it. But there is no fail-safe recipe for how to raise a healthy well-adjusted child.

Why is this the case?  There are many actors involved – not just us, but also other relatives, teachers and peers, and most importantly not forgetting the child herself, and they all have different views and interests in the raising of the child. There are many environmental factors which you influence but don’t fully control such as the town you live in, the school you send the child to, what the child eats, exposure to illness, exposure to violence in society, consumption of media etc.  The relationship between the actors and the factors is “complex” and it’s hard to predict what approach will work best at a given time, and its not certain that what worked for one child will work for another. It’s hard (as any parent will tell you), but its certainly possible. People do it all the time.

Turning back to aid and development, there are multiple actors and factors all interconnected in ways which make the outcome of any specific action very hard to predict. But that doesn’t mean that there is nothing we can do, nor that we need deep academic knowledge or expensive consultants. An aid agency is only one of the multiple actors in the system but it can still take action and make an impact, even if the exact nature and scale of the impact can’t be easily predicted in advance.

Here are a few suggestions:

1. Start something that seems a reasonable approach based on what we know at the outset (drawing on information such as what has worked elsewhere, whatever scientific literature exists, what do partners say, what own experience and instinct tells us).

2. Adapt your approach over time in light of your actual experience and how well you are doing. Be prepared to modify and improve your approach continually based on what actually happens rather than what theory or past experience tells us.

3. If things are not working at all, admit it , stop doing it, try something else.

4. Continually collect and widely share data and information on what you are doing and what the results are.

5. Build in feedback mechanisms to see how you are doing including feedback from beneficiaries.

6. Try multiple experiments  – don’t put all your resources into a single approach. This way you can compare different methods and then scale up the most promising one(s).

7. Look out for and be open to unintended outcomes. These could be both negative and positive. It might be that the project has a positive benefit, just not the one you were initially looking for when you started out. Also small changes can sometimes  have large impacts.

And for those who are ready for it there are more sophisticated tools and approaches you can use in practice for programming (e.g. action learning, fail fast) and continual learning and evaluation (e.g. most significant change, outcome mapping).

There are many others who have written much more eloquently than me on this, but I just wanted to get down online that development is a complex problem, but there are still simple things we can do to work on it if we are just prepared to look at it differently from how we ave in the past.

[postscript: by chance, or perhaps by spontaneous order, Bill Easterly also posted on this exact same topic on aidwatch today – I’d suggest you also take a look at what he has to say]

Written by Ian Thorpe

January 19, 2011 at 8:30 am

14 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Great post!
    minor typo in 11th paragraph:
    “raiding” a child…

    Will Townes

    January 19, 2011 at 9:31 am

    • Thanks for the catch. There were a few others too. Blogging late at night in the dark not such a good idea!

      Ian Thorpe

      January 19, 2011 at 10:06 am

  2. […] Thorpe writes a piece on ‘who’s afraid of complexity’ on KM on a Dollar a […]

  3. […] this article: Who’s afraid of complexity in aid? AKPC_IDS += "9866,";Popularity: 50% […]

  4. […] problems are “wicked problems”  i.e. they are complex (see my previous post on […]

  5. Great post Ian,
    Part of what I suspect scares some regular folks off is the word complexity itself — especially when combined with the words “aid” and “development. Sorry, but I would say most normal people tune out when they hear those words. Too vague and wonky sounding.
    I like your notion of comparing this to child-raising. Another way to say this is to make analogy with the human body, or climate. We really don’t have much of a comprehensive grip on truly understanding the workings of either the human body or climate, but that doesn’t mean we can afford to stop trying.
    The same goes for aid and development, I think, but the community needs to make the case for why. When I see development experts like Easterly arguing the case for complexity, I tend to agree. But I also worry that they are unintentionally making the case for those who think aid is so complex (in both doing and evaluating its progress) that, well, it’s just not worth doing.
    Cheers
    Tom
    Cheers

    Tom Paulson

    January 22, 2011 at 3:24 pm

  6. […] Ian Thorpe probeert de discussie over complexiteit wat minder academisch te maken en komt met een 7-tal praktische suggesties. Ben Ramilingam onderhoudt een blog speciaal over complexiteit en hulp: Aid on the Edge of Chaos. […]

  7. […] in the world of development aid and humanitarian assistance, are not complicated they are complex (see here for a previous blog about complex systems in aid and ways to address them). They can’t easily be […]

  8. […] that takes place through collaboration, competition and even contradiction. In short it’s a complex adaptive system. Past technological spread has always resulted from the actions of multiple actors often with very […]

  9. […] that takes place through collaboration, competition and even contradiction. In short it’s a complex adaptive system. Past technological spread has always resulted from the actions of multiple actors often with very […]

  10. […] In our desire to understand something, and to “break it down” so we can tackle it in manageable pieces or sell it to donors, or the public, we often forget that many of the things we are dealing with are “complex adaptive systems” where the whole works differently from the sum of the parts and where a good practice in one context might not work in another. Of course, this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use evidence – but we need to understand it in context, and  apply it flexibly rather than expecting to find universal answers. (See my previous blog “Who’s afraid of complexity in aid”) […]

  11. […] the trend towards innovation work, and discussions around complexity in development an increasingly popular approach is to get together a group of people, preferably […]

  12. […] of a whole other blog post but a couple of references on this are i) a previous blog I wrote on “Who’s afraid of complexity in aid?” and Duncan Green’s latest blog on “What to do when you don’t know what’s going to […]

  13. […] Footnote: here is an older blog post I wrote on complexity back in 2011 when I was trying to explain to myself exactly what it is and what it means for development – Who’s afraid of complexity in aid? […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: