KM on a dollar a day

Musing on knowledge management, aid and development with limited resources

MOOCs: Relevant for development?

with 8 comments

[I’ve been terrible at keeping up to regular blogging over the past few months so I’m going to try to blog shorter pieces, straight from the hip, but more frequently – here’s the first in the new format, let’s see how it goes]

One of the latest crazes in learning that everyone is talking about is MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). These are web-based training courses that are usually run according to a specific timetable or schedule, but which are open to participation by anyone and are free to join and can potentially host an unlimited number of participants as their design allows them to be scaled to support large numbers. They are usually asynchronous meaning that although they may follow a specific timetable, participants can carry out their learning activities at any time of day. Common features that allow MOOCs to work are standardized instruction that can be accessed at any time such as pre-recorded presentations, standardized course readings, and use of standard self-completion quizzes and tests to assess progress.

But what makes them different from say standard self-completion courses on CD-ROM (or courses such as online driver’s education courses) is the interactivity between course participants in the form of individual or team based assignments, online discussions and with participants “marking” or giving feedback to each other on their coursework and progress. The peer-to-peer elements means that participants can learn from each other as well as from the official course material and  this keeps the need for interaction and support by official tutors to a minimum which allows the courses to be scaled to large numbers.

As with any new technological innovation MOOCs are currently making their way through the hype cycle, with people gushing about how they will revolutionize learning and make traditional college based learning obsolete. This is balanced by a number of skeptics, and perhaps a growing number of realists who see through experience that while promising the benefits have probably also been over-hyped. Here are a few personal observations on MOOCs and their potential in aid/development work from a non-expert, but someone who has participated in a number of them and has contributed to developing at least one of them:

1. MOOCs offer open access to educational content that was previously unavailable to most. A large number of renowned colleges and schools have made  content available for free online that could normally only be accessed by enrolled, paying students who could attend the classes in person. You still need a computer and internet, and the course material itself may require a certain level of education and experience in order to benefit from it, but it is a huge step forward in opening up knowledge. This means that they have a great potential for broadening education and outreach to new and global audiences – including on topics relevant to development. On a more selfish note, they are also a great potential learning resource for development workers.

2. Participating in a MOOC is nothing like being on a real college course. Following pre-recorded lectures online does not give the nuance and flavour of sitting in a lecture hall with a great teacher, and being able to interact with the professors and with other students in person. With online learning what you get out of it is also even more dependent on what you put into it than for in person courses. With a course that is free and online it is easy to be distractedly reading your e-mails while listening to the videos, or to not take the time to do the readings or assignments or to drop out altogether. But if you put in the effort you can get a lot out of it, even if it’s not as good as a face to face event.

3. The design of MOOCs for optimal online learning is probably in its early stages. Quality varies widely  and many have somewhat uninspiring online videos of talking heads and somewhat simplistic online discussion questions where the quality of discussion is very dependent on who the organizers were able to attract to the course in the first place. The  majority of courses are also run as online analogues of existing college courses rather than something adapted more to the audience, medium and external demand. Some of the more promising aspects of the methodology are the work on group projects and peer feedback and other tools to connect participants together – in particular the chance to work on group assignments with people who are much more diverse that you normally find on a typical college course or workplace – an experience which is both challenging and very educational. I expect that over time we will see more experimentation with formats, and as a result, some improvements in teaching methodology to make them more interesting and their content more memorable. I also expect that the content of courses will evolve away from simply repurposing of college material into material more adapted to the interests, aptitudes and schedules of different audiences.

4. Who pays for MOOCs? From a user perspective they are free, but someone still needs to pay for adapting all that content, hosting it online and marketing it. For now, many people are keen to get into this new business and so are making content available without necessarily having a clear idea about the sustainability of the approach. That will not last. If content providers can’t see a clear benefit such improved demand for their in person courses then their incentive to keep working in this area will be limited. So a sustainable funding model will be needed, and one that doesn’t cannibalize existing learning opportunities and that maintains openness. But I can also see a possibility for MOOCs to be used for publicly funded learning either as a public good e.g. entrepreneurship training  for the unemployed or for small business owners; or as a combination of advocacy and learning such as a course on human rights that would be both educational but also try to change hearts and minds in the process. I can also see  possibilities for commercial sponsorship for courses – which could help fund courses but would also introduce its own challenges in terms of how impartial the content provided will actually be.

In summary – I can see great potential for MOOCs in the world of development (although not quite as much as their backers proclaim), especially given the global nature of our work and our diverse and dispersed networks of partners and stakeholders. The methodology for organizing them and their sustainability still has some way to go, but I think it is worth development organizations to be experimenting with them in at least a couple of ways:

i) Developing pilot courses in the MOOC format for areas where there is a need or demand for large-scale learning on development issues and where the UN has expertise  (an example would be the MyMandE initiative for e-learning on evaluation of development work aimed at aid practitioners and national government staff). This could be courses developed specifically for a mass audience, or adaptation of existing training materials to make them open, and also taking steps to maker them more interactive.

ii) Working with MOOC providers to encourage them to offer courses relevant to development practitioners, and internally in organizations to make staff better aware of the opportunities that are out there. This would involve identifying relevant offerings, but also reviewing content and delivery for relevance and quality as MOOC offerings vary widely.

There’s probably also some lessons to be learned through the participatory approaches used in the courses both to enhance our own (closed) learning events but also in terms of how we can get diverse and dispersed groups of people to collaborate online more broadly.


Written by Ian Thorpe

June 12, 2013 at 2:10 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

8 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Check out the recent MOOC EDuTechDebate and look for a cool event on MOOCs in DC on June 25th – maybe you’ll actually come down for that one Ian.


    June 12, 2013 at 2:55 pm

  2. […] Originally posted here: MOOCs: Relevant for development? […]

  3. […] Blogger KM on a dollar a day set forth a interesting analysis of MOOCs as they relate to the field of international […]

  4. […] [I've been terrible at keeping up to regular blogging over the past few months so I'm going to try to blog shorter pieces, straight from the hip, but more frequently – here's the first in the new f…  […]

  5. […] [I've been terrible at keeping up to regular blogging over the past few months so I'm going to try to blog shorter pieces, straight from the hip, but more frequently – here's the first in the new f…  […]

  6. […] [I've been terrible at keeping up to regular blogging over the past few months so I'm going to try to blog shorter pieces, straight from the hip, but more frequently – here's the first in the new f…  […]

  7. Hi Ian,
    MOOCs are indeed all over the place nowadays and I support most of your reflections:
    – Lot of them are more MOORs than MOOCs; which refers to Massive Online Open Resources, and simply having access to it for free is quite amazing, remember how many millions of dollars on textbooks have been spent in the last 2000 years? Lot of participants access MOOCs rather as a resource than as a course. I participated as you know in the Venture Lab’s creativity course with about 60.000 people, only 4000 of them finished it as a course.
    – We should learn indeed from the rapid iteration cycle of how this courses are jointly designed. Having data coming from thousands users must be super interesting for the feedback loop, constant re-iteration and optimization. It’s for the first time that I really see a LEAN approach in course development that is reasonable in terms of investment of resources.
    – When we evaluate MOOCs we have a natural tendency to look with the glasses of traditional education and that might not always be a good starting point. Most of the participants engaging in MOOCs are there simply to learn in an informal way, not always to get a certified degree. Some institutions have also complete different objectives when they are rolling out these MOOCs. I recently saw a Technology Enterpreneurship MOOC which basically selected the best teamworks among thousands of assignments and these crowdsourced concepts later were used to transform them in potential start-ups. Maybe traditional education can learn from that.
    – I am currently following the MOOC Quality Project because so far not much research and evidence on MOOCs has been done yet. It’s interesting to see that the first models and classifications are rising up. Hopefully I learn more about it there:
    – We should indeed come up with a list of useful MOOC4DEVs and they are indeed out there. Two years ago I participated in a very interesting MobiMooc
    My participation resulted finally in a mobile learning toolkit that we have developed for one of our projects. I accidently learned a lot, but my major aim was to get a project deliverable throughout the different deadlines of the MOOC.
    – Maybe we should based on our blogposts and reflections do a joint session about it in our upcoming Learning Link, an event that will explore the concept of sustainable learning in different ways . You are more than welcome.


    Tom Wambeke

    July 4, 2013 at 3:55 am

  8. […] externally developed courses through their Learning Manager System. Other options include use of MOOCs (massively open online courses), webinars or other online and remote learning […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: